Hoka Speedgoat 7 vs Saucony Peregrine 16
Hoka Speedgoat 7 vs Saucony Peregrine 16: weight, drop (4 mm vs 4 mm), cushioning, lugs and which races each one suits best.
Quick verdict
The Saucony Peregrine 16 is 4 g lighter. The Hoka Speedgoat 7 has more cushioning (37 mm at the heel). The Hoka Speedgoat 7 grips better, with 4.5 mm lugs.
HokaHoka Speedgoat 7The best-selling trail shoe in the US and an absolute ultra-trail classic. Max Hoka cushioning, a Vibram Megagrip outsole with 5 mm lugs for grip in mud and technical terrain, and a snug Matryx upper. Built to eat up kilometres without punishing your legs in long races.
Check price(se abre en una pestaña nueva)Hoka Speedgoat 7: specs and races
SauconySaucony Peregrine 16The all-round trail shoe par excellence, with excellent reviews across every type of runner. PWRTRAC outsole with 5 mm lugs for grip on mixed and technical terrain, balanced PWRRUN cushioning, and rock-plate protection depending on the version. The perfect middle ground between responsiveness and protection.
Check price(se abre en una pestaña nueva)Saucony Peregrine 16: specs and racesSpec-by-spec comparison
| Spec | Hoka Speedgoat 7 | Saucony Peregrine 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (per shoe) | 275 g | 271 g |
| Drop | 4 mm | 4 mm |
| Heel stack | 37 mm | 32 mm |
| Forefoot stack | 33 mm | 28 mm |
| Lug depth | 4.5 mm | 3.5 mm |
| Fit | Narrow | Narrow |
| Stable platform | ✓ | – |
| Waterproof | – | – |
| Carbon plate | – | – |
| Terrain | mixed, technical, mud | mixed, technical |
Brand-stated specs or values measured by independent sources. Green marks the better value when one is clearly better.
Which races does each one suit? Checked against 249 races
For each race we look at the terrain, the distance and the average rainfall around race day in recent years, and see which shoe fits best.
Hoka Speedgoat 7: better pick in 141 of 249
Tied in 108
We couldn't find that race in our calendar. Try another name or the town.
| Race | What it needs | Hoka Speedgoat 7 | Saucony Peregrine 16 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grand Raid de La Réunion180 km | Ultra: cushioning | Built for it | Copes |
| L'Infernal Trail des Vosges205 km | Likely mud | Built for it | Not its terrain |
| Nice Côte d'Azur by UTMB168 km | Ultra: cushioning | Built for it | Copes |
| Topo Athletic Bibracte Ultra-Trail185 km | Likely mud | Built for it | Not its terrain |
| Trail Menorca Camí de Cavalls185 km | Likely mud | Built for it | Not its terrain |
| Ultra Tour des 4 Massifs176 km | Ultra: cushioning | Built for it | Copes |
| Ultra Trail Gran Vuelta al Valle del Genal167 km | Ultra: cushioning | Built for it | Copes |
| UTMB Mont-Blanc174 km | Ultra: cushioning | Built for it | Copes |
Criteria: mud when it often rains around race day on soft ground; rock for skyrunning and vertical kilometres; ultra from 50 km; mixed otherwise.
Analysis: where they really differ
Both have a 4 mm drop and a narrow fit, and both are mountain best-sellers. The Speedgoat 7 has more foam (37 mm) and deeper lugs (4.5 mm) for ultras and mud; the Peregrine 16 is slightly lighter and lower, nimbler on technical ground.
Choose the Hoka Speedgoat 7 if…
- You are training for an ultra or long mountain races.
- Your race is often muddy.
- You want more cushioning on descents.
Choose the Saucony Peregrine 16 if…
- You run technical races up to marathon distance.
- You prefer ground feel and a nimble ride.
- You want the lighter option (271 g).