Asics Gel-Trabuco 14 GTX vs Hoka Speedgoat 7
Asics Gel-Trabuco 14 GTX vs Hoka Speedgoat 7: weight, drop (8 mm vs 4 mm), cushioning, lugs and which races each one suits best.
Quick verdict
The Hoka Speedgoat 7 is 6 g lighter. The Hoka Speedgoat 7 grips better, with 4.5 mm lugs.
AsicsAsics Gel-Trabuco 14 GTXA best-selling beginner trail shoe: GEL cushioning, good stability and a waterproof GORE-TEX membrane. Versatile and reliable for training on mixed terrain in any weather.
Check price(se abre en una pestaña nueva)Asics Gel-Trabuco 14 GTX: specs and races
HokaHoka Speedgoat 7The best-selling trail shoe in the US and an absolute ultra-trail classic. Max Hoka cushioning, a Vibram Megagrip outsole with 5 mm lugs for grip in mud and technical terrain, and a snug Matryx upper. Built to eat up kilometres without punishing your legs in long races.
Check price(se abre en una pestaña nueva)Hoka Speedgoat 7: specs and racesSpec-by-spec comparison
| Spec | Asics Gel-Trabuco 14 GTX | Hoka Speedgoat 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (per shoe) | 281 g | 275 g |
| Drop | 8 mm | 4 mm |
| Heel stack | 36 mm | 37 mm |
| Forefoot stack | 28 mm | 33 mm |
| Lug depth | 3.7 mm | 4.5 mm |
| Fit | Wide | Narrow |
| Stable platform | – | ✓ |
| Waterproof | – | – |
| Carbon plate | – | – |
| Terrain | mixed, smooth | mixed, technical, mud |
Brand-stated specs or values measured by independent sources. Green marks the better value when one is clearly better.
Which races does each one suit? Checked against 249 races
For each race we look at the terrain, the distance and the average rainfall around race day in recent years, and see which shoe fits best.
Hoka Speedgoat 7: better pick in 109 of 249
Tied in 140
We couldn't find that race in our calendar. Try another name or the town.
| Race | What it needs | Asics Gel-Trabuco 14 GTX | Hoka Speedgoat 7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grand Raid de La Réunion180 km | Ultra: cushioning | Built for it | Built for it |
| L'Infernal Trail des Vosges205 km | Likely mud | Not its terrain | Built for it |
| Mañaritik Atxetara43 km | Rock and technical ground | Not its terrain | Built for it |
| Nice Côte d'Azur by UTMB168 km | Ultra: cushioning | Built for it | Built for it |
| Topo Athletic Bibracte Ultra-Trail185 km | Likely mud | Not its terrain | Built for it |
| Trail Menorca Camí de Cavalls185 km | Likely mud | Not its terrain | Built for it |
| Ultra Tour des 4 Massifs176 km | Ultra: cushioning | Built for it | Built for it |
| UTMB Mont-Blanc174 km | Ultra: cushioning | Built for it | Built for it |
Criteria: mud when it often rains around race day on soft ground; rock for skyrunning and vertical kilometres; ultra from 50 km; mixed otherwise.
Analysis: where they really differ
They weigh almost the same (281 vs 275 g), but the fit is the big difference. The Trabuco 14 has a wide fit, an 8 mm drop and 3.7 mm lugs: comfortable and made for getting started on fire roads and trails. The Speedgoat 7 has a snug fit, a 4 mm drop, more foam under the forefoot (33 vs 28 mm) and 4.5 mm lugs for technical ground and mud.
Choose the Asics Gel-Trabuco 14 GTX if…
- You have wide feet and want room for your toes.
- You are new to trail and run mostly on fire roads and trails.
- You prefer a mid-range drop (8 mm).
Choose the Hoka Speedgoat 7 if…
- You are training for an ultra or technical mountain races.
- You need more grip on rock and mud (4.5 mm lugs).
- You have narrow feet and like a snug fit.